Yesterday, I watched the guest vlog statement of Greg Hlibok via the KISS-FIST ASL blog. While watching it, Mr. Hlibok used two examples to describe the Deaf President Now of 1988 for comparative, idealistic purposes: the French Revolution and the 1960s Civil Rights movement. The overall vlog was a very nice presentation by one of the four student-leaders of the DPN of ‘88, as he explained that the whole protest and struggle was not about Gallaudet University but for the whole deaf community and deaf culture in the country and worldwide, seeking and striving for better opportunities and improved qualities of life for the deaf. Though, I don’t have a problem with Hlibok’s guest vlog in general, for history’s and awareness’ sake.
I, however, have a problem with his choice of the French Revolution as an one of the comparative examples about progress in the modern society, especially he used the French Revolution to highlight the struggle and progress of the deaf through the history, up to the 1960s era of the Civil Rights movement, culminating with a hallmark event: the Deaf President Now of 1988. Mr. Hlibok, as a witness and participant in that time, became one of the key leaders in invigorating and inspiring not only the student body at Gallaudet but the deaf community across the nation. In the guest vlog, he explained that the French revolution was about eradicating poverty. I disagree. Historians who know and studied the causes and effects of that revolution for years have never come to a firm consensus on the issue of poverty being one of the main causes of the French Revolution. Too many coincidental and consequential factors came into the play, as they said.
The outcomes of the French Revolution didn’t result in eradicating poverty and among other things anyway (yes, Greg did mentioned this in the guest vlog). In this regard, I’m a student of history and the French Revolution is one of many pursuing interests of mine, looking for the real causes and effects instead of accepting the official version, which is generally overstated and simplistic. The actual outcomes of the French Revolution produced two historic events: the tragically mad Reign of Terror and the rise of tyranny in the person of Napoleon Bonaparté, compelled by the very people who sought to free France from the confines of old imperialistic regime. A lot of beheadings, more riots and wars to hunt down the enemies of the revolution and a complete loss of public confidence toward the revolutionary leaders.
I’d posted a comment in the KISS-FIST ASL blog which I think Mr. Hlibok should have use the American Revolution as a better example (after all, the French Revolution was motivated and inspired by it!):
Nice vlog about 20th anniv. of DPN but curious…why he picked the French Revolution as an example? It resulted in madness and ended in tragic consequences, allowing tyranny to take form gradually.
The American Revolution, on the other hand, was all about ending oppression by a faraway king and allowing people of the colonies to be free to make their own choices and futures. The DPN was all about ending oppression from the confines of institutional thinking and decisions made by the hearing authorities and let deaf people determines its own courses and futures, for the Deaf/HOH and for the deaf community everywhere. I would identify the DPN struggle and its outcomes to be more akin to the American revolution than the French revolution.
Don’t get me wrong. I got to know Greg Hlibok few times when I was at Gallaudet. A pleasant, intelligent and charismatic fella, I say. He graduated from Gallaudet just at the time I graduated from W. T. Woodson High in Fairfax, Virginia. We have crossed paths few times over the years. Fantastic guy, even as a progressive liberal.
But I disagreed with his choice of the French Revolution as a comparative (inspiring?) example for the DPN of 1988. Wrong example. The American Revolution. Better example. After all, the DPN was all about freeing ourselves from the confines of an old order and forge ahead a future of our own making that would get people everywhere to notice and respect the deaf.
No beheading or terror involved. No tyrant emerged afterward. That progress and awareness? Right, Greg?